Diagnosis and treatment challenges in lower resource countries: State-of-the-art.

The 2022 World Federation of Haemophilia Annual Global Survey (AGS) reports that 454,690 patients with inherited bleeding disorders (IBD) have been identified globally. While this represents noteworthy progress, haemophilia epidemiology data indicate that 75% of people with inherited bleeding disorders living in low-income and low-to-middle-income countries have yet to be diagnosed. The AGS also revealed that 11 billion clotting factor units are available to treat haemophilia A and B globally. Due to a lack of finance, these treatments are unavailable to haemophilia in low-income countries with a consequence lack of access equity for haemophilia treatment in these communities. This sobering reality is not limited to haemophilia but applies to von Willebrand Disease (VWD). While VWD is the most prevalent IBD, only 103,844 people living with this condition have been diagnosed globally. Of the diagnosed patients, only a fraction live in low- or middle-income countries. Moreover, the majority of VWD patients are still treated sub-optimally without replacement therapies or prophylaxis, both of which are now accepted as global standards of care. In this state-of-the-art review, the authors reflect on three issues. First, the minimum elements required to diagnose haemophilia in a resource-constrained setting are identified. Second, this review points to the critical stakeholders and outlines their roles in removing access to haemophilia treatment barriers. Finally, the authors examine von Willebrand disease's ongoing diagnostic and treatment challenges and compare these to haemophilia. With the rapidly evolving novel therapies, the therapeutic landscape of all IBD will likely change for the better.

Benefits and risks of non-factor therapies: Redefining haemophilia treatment goals in the era of new technologies.

INTRODUCTION: Over the last decades progress in haemophilia treatment has been remarkable and prophylaxis with clotting factor concentrates in haemophilia A and B has been established as the standard of care in individuals with haemophilia and a severe bleeding phenotype. Besides clotting factor products with prolonged half-life non-factor therapies were developed which enable prophylaxis via subcutaneous administration. Factor VIIIa mimetics like emicizumab facilitate the coagulation pathway and are used in routine clinical practice for indivdiduals with haemophilia A. Rebalancing therapeutic agents like fitusiran, concizumab, marstacimab and serpin PC block the anticoagulant pathway and clinical trials using these products in individuals with haemophilia A and B are ongoing. AIM AND METHODS: A narrative review to asess the benefits and risks of non-factor therapies taking in to account re-defined haemophilia treatment goals. RESULTS: Prophylaxis for prevention of bleeds using non-factor products by subcutaneous administration is effective and results in reductions of bleeding episodes in individuals with haemophilia A or B with and without inhibitors. The treatment with emicizumab showed tolerable safety both in clinical trials and long-term real-world observations with few thrombotic events. In some clinical trials with rebalancing therapies (fitusiran and concizumab) thrombotic events occurred. Monitoring of the haemostatic function of novel therapies especially with concomitant haemostatic treatment is not yet established. CONCLUSION: With the advent of novel therapeutic agents including factor concentrates with ultra-long half-life and improved FVIIIa mimetics aimed at raising the bar of protection into the non-hemophilic range redefinition of haemophilia treatment goals is eagerly needed.

Rare bleeding disorders: Advances in management.

Inherited factor coagulation deficiencies and vascular bleeding disorders, associated with bleeding of various severity, are often classified as rare bleeding disorders (RBDs). These include inherited fibrinogen disorders, inherited platelet function disorders (IPFD) and hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). In the last decades, there have been large increases in knowledge on the epidemiology, genetics, physiopathology, clinical features, and diagnosis of RBDs, but improvements in management have been more limited and remain challenging. The treatment mainstay of RBDs is based only on replacement of a few available coagulation factor concentrates or cryoprecipitates. There is growing interest in therapeutic agents that enhance coagulation or inhibiting anticoagulant pathways in RBDs. In severe IPFD, the optimal platelet transfusion strategy is not yet established. Moreover, data is scarce on the effectiveness and safety of desmopressin and/or antifibrinolytic drugs often used for milder IPFD treatment. The best fibrinogen replacement strategy (prophylaxis vs. on demand) in afibrinogenemia is still debated. Similarly, the optimal trough fibrinogen target level for treatment of acute bleeding, and the role of fibrinogen replacement during pregnancy in mild hypofibrinogenemia and dysfibrinogenemia, have not been properly evaluated. The therapeutic arsenal in HHT includes antifibrinolytics and a series of antiangiogenic agents whose potential efficacy has been tested in small studies or are under investigation for treatment of bleeding. However, there is need to address several issues, including the optimal dosing strategies, the potential emergent toxicity of longer-term use, and the impact of systemic antiangiogenic treatment on visceral arteriovenous malformations.

Non-clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B.

BACKGROUND: Management of congenital hemophilia A and B is by prophylactic or on-demand replacement therapy with clotting factor concentrates. The effects of newer non-clotting factor therapies such as emicizumab, concizumab, marstacimab, and fitusiran compared with existing standards of care are yet to be systematically reviewed. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects (clinical, economic, patient-reported, and adverse outcomes) of non-clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeding and bleeding-related complications in people with congenital hemophilia A or B compared with prophylaxis with clotting factor therapies, bypassing agents, placebo, or no prophylaxis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register, electronic databases, conference proceedings, and reference lists of relevant articles and reviews. The date of the last search was 16 August 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating people with congenital hemophilia A or B with and without inhibitors, who were treated with non-clotting factor therapies to prevent bleeds. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently reviewed studies for eligibility, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data for the primary outcomes (bleeding rates, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), adverse events) and secondary outcomes (joint health, pain scores, and economic outcomes). We assessed the mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), 95% confidence interval (CI) of effect estimates, and evaluated the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: Six RCTs (including 397 males aged 12 to 75 years) were eligible for inclusion. Prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy in people with inhibitors Four trials (189 participants) compared emicizumab, fitusiran, and concizumab with on-demand therapy in people with inhibitors. Prophylaxis using emicizumab likely reduced annualized bleeding rates (ABR) for all bleeds (MD -22.80, 95% CI -37.39 to -8.21), treated bleeds (MD -20.40, 95% CI -35.19 to -5.61), and annualized spontaneous bleeds (MD -15.50, 95% CI -24.06 to -6.94), but did not significantly reduce annualized joint and target joint bleeding rates (AjBR and AtjBR) (1 trial; 53 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Fitusiran also likely reduced ABR for all bleeds (MD -28.80, 95% CI -40.07 to -17.53), treated bleeds (MD -16.80, 95% CI -25.80 to -7.80), joint bleeds (MD -12.50, 95% CI -19.91 to -5.09), and spontaneous bleeds (MD -14.80, 95% CI -24.90 to -4.71; 1 trial; 57 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No evidence was available on the effect of bleed prophylaxis using fitusiran versus on-demand therapy on AtjBR. Concizumab may reduce ABR for all bleeds (MD -12.31, 95% CI -19.17 to -5.45), treated bleeds (MD -10.10, 95% CI -17.74 to -2.46), joint bleeds (MD -9.55, 95% CI -13.55 to -5.55), and spontaneous bleeds (MD -11.96, 95% CI -19.89 to -4.03; 2 trials; 78 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but not target joint bleeds (MD -1.00, 95% CI -3.26 to 1.26). Emicizumab prophylaxis resulted in an 11.31-fold increase, fitusiran in a 12.5-fold increase, and concizumab in a 1.59-fold increase in the proportion of participants with no bleeds. HRQoL measured using the Haemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) physical and total health scores was improved with emicizumab, fitusiran, and concizumab prophylaxis (low-certainty evidence). Non-serious adverse events were higher with non-clotting factor therapies versus on-demand therapy, with injection site reactions being the most frequently reported adverse events. Transient antidrug antibodies were reported for fitusiran and concizumab. Prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy in people without inhibitors Two trials (208 participants) compared emicizumab and fitusiran with on-demand therapy in people without inhibitors. One trial assessed two doses of emicizumab (1.5 mg/kg weekly and 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly). Fitusiran 80 mg monthly, emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week, and emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly all likely resulted in a large reduction in ABR for all bleeds, all treated bleeds, and joint bleeds. AtjBR was not reduced with either of the emicizumab dosing regimens. The effect of fitusiran prophylaxis on target joint bleeds was not assessed. Spontaneous bleeds were likely reduced with fitusiran (MD -20.21, 95% CI -32.12 to -8.30) and emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly (MD -15.30, 95% CI -30.46 to -0.14), but not with emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week (MD -14.60, 95% CI -29.78 to 0.58). The percentage of participants with zero bleeds was higher following emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week (50% versus 0%), emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly (40% versus 0%), and fitusiran prophylaxis (40% versus 5%) compared with on-demand therapy. Emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week did not improve Haem-A-QoL physical and total health scores, EQ-5D-5L VAS, or utility index scores (low-certainty evidence) when compared with on-demand therapy at 25 weeks. Emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly may improve HRQoL measured by the Haem-A-QoL physical health score (MD -15.97, 95% CI -29.14 to -2.80) and EQ-5D-5L VAS (MD 9.15, 95% CI 2.05 to 16.25; 1 trial; 43 participants; low-certainty evidence). Fitusiran may result in improved HRQoL shown as a reduction in Haem-A-QoL total score (MD -7.06, 95% CI -11.50 to -2.62) and physical health score (MD -19.75, 95% CI -25.76 to -11.94; 1 trial; 103 participants; low-certainty evidence). The risk of serious adverse events in participants without inhibitors also likely did not differ following prophylaxis with either emicizumab or fitusiran versus on-demand therapy (moderate-certainty evidence). Transient antidrug antibodies were reported in 4% (3/80) participants to fitusiran, with no observed effect on antithrombin lowering. A comparison of the different dosing regimens of emicizumab identified no differences in bleeding, safety, or patient-reported outcomes. No case of treatment-related cancer or mortality was reported in any study group. None of the included studies assessed our secondary outcomes of joint health, clinical joint function, and economic outcomes. None of the included studies evaluated marstacimab. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from RCTs shows that prophylaxis using non-clotting factor therapies compared with on-demand treatment may reduce bleeding events, increase the percentage of individuals with zero bleeds, increase the incidence of non-serious adverse events, and improve HRQoL. Comparative assessments with other prophylaxis regimens, assessment of long-term joint outcomes, and assessment of economic outcomes will improve evidence-based decision-making for the use of these therapies in bleed prevention.

Fixed- Versus Variable-Dose Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for the Emergent Reversal of Vitamin K Antagonists: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4-PCC) is recommended for rapid reversal of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) such as warfarin, yet optimal dosing remains uncertain. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review was conducted of PubMed, Embase, and Ovid MEDLINE (Wolters Kluwer) databases from January 2000 to August 2023 for clinical studies comparing fixed- vs. variable-dose 4-PCC for emergent VKA reversal with at least one reported clinical outcome. STUDY SELECTION: Abstracts and full texts were assessed independently and in duplicate by two reviewers. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted independently and in duplicate by two reviewers using predefined extraction forms. DATA SYNTHESIS: The analysis comprised three randomized trials and 16 cohort studies comprising a total of 323 participants in randomized trials (161 in fixed dosage and 162 in variable dosage) and 1912 patients in cohort studies (858 in fixed-dose and 1054 in variable dose). Extracranial bleeding was the predominant indication, while intracranial hemorrhage varied. Overall, a fixed-dose regimen may be associated with a lower dose of 4-PCC and results in a reduction in 4-PCC administration time compared with a variable-dose regimen. A fixed-dose regimen also likely results in increased clinical hemostasis. While there is no clear difference between the two regimens in terms of achieving a goal international normalized ratio (INR) less than 2, a fixed-dose regimen is less likely to achieve a goal INR less than 1.5. High certainty evidence indicates that the fixed-dose regimen reduces both mortality and the occurrence of thromboembolic events. Additional subgroup analyses provides exploratory data to guide future studies. CONCLUSIONS: A fixed-dose regimen for 4-PCC administration provides benefits over a variable-dose regimen in terms of dose reduction, faster administration time, improved clinical hemostasis, and reduced mortality and thromboembolic events. Further studies are warranted to better refine the optimal fixed-dose regimen.

Massive transfusion in trauma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of currently recommended treatment approaches for traumatic hemorrhage shock, with a special focus on massive transfusion. RECENT FINDINGS: Severe trauma patients require massive transfusion, but consensual international definitions for traumatic hemorrhage shock and massive transfusion are missing. Current literature defines a massive transfusion as transfusion of a minimum of 3-4 packed red blood cells within 1 h. Using standard laboratory and/or viscoelastic tests, earliest diagnosis and treatment should focus on trauma-induced coagulopathy and substitution of substantiated deficiencies. SUMMARY: To initiate therapy immediately massive transfusion protocols are helpful focusing on early hemorrhage control using hemostatic dressing and tourniquets, correction of metabolic derangements to decrease coagulopathy and substitution according to viscoelastic assays and blood gases analysis with tranexamic acid, fibrinogen concentrate, red blood cells, plasma and platelets are recommended. Alternatively, the use of whole blood is possible. If needed, further support using prothrombin complex, factor XIII or desmopressin is suggested.

Trends in the Use of Recombinant Activated Factor VII and Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Heart Transplant Patients in Virginia.

OBJECTIVES: To explore trends in intraoperative procoagulant factor concentrate use in patients undergoing heart transplantation (HTx) in Virginia. Secondarily, to evaluate their association with postoperative thrombosis. DESIGN: Patients who underwent HTx were identified using a statewide database. Trends in off-label recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) use and on-label and off-label prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) use were tested using the Mantel-Haenszel test. Multivariate logistic regression was used to test for an association between procoagulant factor concentrate administration and thrombosis. SETTING: Virginia hospitals performing HTx. PARTICIPANTS: Adults undergoing HTx between 2012 and 2022. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 899 patients who required HTx, 100 (11.1%) received off-label rFVIIa, 69 (7.7%) received on-label PCC, and 80 (8.9%) received off-label PCC. There was a downward trend in the use of rFVIIa over the 10-year period (p = 0.04). There was no trend in on-label PCC use (p = 0.12); however, there was an increase in off-label PCC use (p < 0.001). Patients who received rFVIIa were transfused more and had longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (p < 0.001). Receipt of rFVIIa was associated with increased thrombotic risk (odds ratio [OR] 1.92; 95% CI 1.12-3.29; p = 0.02), whereas on-label and off-label PCC use had no association with thrombosis (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.49-1.96, p = 0.96 for on-label use; and OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.29-1.30, p = 0.20 for off-label use). CONCLUSIONS: Use of rFVIIa in HTx decreased over the past decade, whereas off-label PCC use increased. Receipt of rFVIIa was associated with thrombosis; however, patients who received rFVIIa were more severely ill, and risk adjustment may have been incomplete.

Comparative analysis of andexanet alfa and prothrombin complex concentrate in reversing anticoagulation by rivaroxaban ex vivo.

BACKGROUND: The comparative effectiveness of the specific antidote andexanet alfa vs the nonspecific therapy four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (4F-PCCs) as reversal agents for direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors in severely bleeding patients is unclear. We hypothesised that specific reversal using andexanet alfa would be more effective than a high dose of PCC (50 IU kg-1) for reversing the FXa inhibitor rivaroxaban. METHODS: The reversal potential of andexanet alfa, various 4F-PCCs, and activated PCC was investigated ex vivo in human blood anticoagulated with rivaroxaban (37.5, 75, 150, and 300 ng ml-1) using a panel of coagulation parameters, including conventional coagulation assays, thrombin generation, and a newly developed viscoelastometric device. We simulated in vivo conditions of coagulation activation and fibrin formation using flow chamber experiments of thrombogenicity potential under arterial flow conditions. RESULTS: The 4F-PCCs normalised clotting profiles only at low rivaroxaban concentrations, whereas andexanet alfa and activated PCC significantly shortened clotting time at all rivaroxaban concentrations. Only andexanet alfa restored thrombin generation to baseline. Flow chamber results showed that various 4F-PCCs concentration-dependently restored clot formation. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to thrombin generation measurements, haemostatic reversal of rivaroxaban using high-dose 4F-PCCs exhibited similar efficacy as andexanet alfa in flow chamber experiments. The haemostatic effects of 4F-PCCs and andexanet alfa in the context of bleeding patients taking FXa inhibitors requires further study.

Andexanet alfa or prothrombin complex concentrate for acute reversal of oral factor Xa inhibitors: monitoring of antidote effects.

This study in vitro comprehensively assessed reversal of the anticoagulant effects of rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, using andexanet alfa and various prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) products in a battery of tests. In static coagulation assays, andexanet alpha outperformed PCCs except for activated PCC being more effective in standard coagulation times. However, in a flow chamber model mimicking arterial shear, both andexanet alpha and high-concentration PCC restored fibrin formation, but not platelet adhesion. In the Russell's viper venom test and anti-Xa assay, only andexanet alpha could be tested for efficacy. The antidote effects of andexanet alpha and PCCs in restoring coagulation can be qualitatively or selectively demonstrated using in vitro coagulation tests.

Prothrombin complex concentrate administration timing in warfarin-associated intracranial hemorrhage.

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines recommend "rapid" and "urgent" reversal of anticoagulation for warfarin-associated intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) treatment; however, they do not specify goals for time-to-administration. There are limited studies evaluating time to reversal, or international normalized ratio (INR) correction, on hematoma expansion and outcomes in intervals of <4 h. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of 4-factor prothrombin concentrate (4F-PCC) time-to-administration on rates of achieving effective hemostasis, determined by hematoma expansion, for treatment of warfarin-associated ICH. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, single center study performed at a large community teaching hospital. Patients were stratified into three groups based on time of CT diagnosis of ICH to administration of 4F-PCC: <45 min, 45-90 min, and >90 min. The primary outcome was rates of achieving effective hemostasis in each group defined as a ≤20% increase in hematoma volume as estimated by a radiologist. RESULTS: A total of 227 patients were screened for inclusion with ultimately 39 being included. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The primary outcome was not significantly different among groups stratified by time to 4F-PCC administration of <45 min, 45-90 min, and >90 min (85.7% vs 73.3% vs 90%, p value 0.514). There was no difference among secondary outcomes between groups including in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), and intensive care unit LOS. CONCLUSION: There was no association with time-to-administration of 4F-PCC on rates of hemostasis achievement, defined as hematoma expansion of ≤20%, identified in this study.

Safety and efficacy of fixed versus variable-dose prothrombin complex concentrate for emergent reversal of vitamin K antagonists: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) is standard of care for emergent vitamin K antagonist (VKA) reversal but optimal dosing is uncertain. This meta-analysis estimated the proportion of patients treated with fixed dose (FD) 4F-PCC who achieved adequate reversal and compared safety and efficacy of FD versus weight-based dose (WB) strategies. METHODS: This review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Medline and Scopus were searched and included studies evaluating FD regimens and comparing FD and WB for emergent VKA reversal. Data was pooled using random effects. Subgroup analyses examined heterogeneity. Risk of bias was assessed with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and RoB2 score. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies (n = 2055) were included with twelve (n = 1143) comparing FD versus WB. The proportion of patients achieving goal INR with FD varied depending on the INR target, being significantly higher for INR <2 (90.9%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 87.2, 94.06) compared to INR <1.6 (70.97%, 95%CI 65.33, 76.31). Compared to WB, FD was less likely to achieve a goal INR <1.6 (Risk Difference (RD) -13%, 95% CI -21, -4) but achieved similar reversal for a goal INR <2.0, (RD -1%, 95%CI -7, 4). There was no difference in hospital mortality (RD 4%, 95%CI -2, 9) or thrombosis (RD 0.0%, 95%CI -3, 3). CONCLUSION: FD VKA reversal was associated with significantly lower attainment of goal INR compared to WB with lower INR targets. This did not translate to differences in hospital mortality, but these results should be interpreted cautiously in light of the observational nature of the included studies.

Increasing optimal coagulation factor dosing in the paediatric emergency department: Update to a quality improvement study.

INTRODUCTION: Prompt, appropriate coagulation factor replacement according to injury and bleeding severity in persons with haemophilia is required to prevent acute and long-term complications. AIMS: Increase proportion of persons with haemophilia A (HA) and B (HB) treated appropriately for an acute injury and bleeding episode at a tertiary children's emergency department (ED) from 65% to 85% and sustain for one year. Secondary aim: increase time interval between patient ED encounters with out-of-range factor dosing. METHODS: Utilizing quality improvement methodology and plan-do-study-analyze cycles, ED encounters for individuals with HA/HB receiving coagulation factor replacement for injuries were audited for in-range coagulation factor dosing. Goal factor dose defined as 50% correction for minor bleeds and 100% correction for major bleeds. Optimal dosing range defined as 90%-120% of the calculated goal dose to account for vial size variability. Interventions targeted communication via the EMR problem list and optimization of physician education. RESULTS: Our previous publication demonstrated 33.3% of ED encounters with out-of-range factor replacement. Following several interventions, the cumulative rate of encounters with out-of-range dosing decreased to 18%. Overall, there was an increase in the mean percent of encounters receiving optimal factor dosing for both HA/HB compared to baseline (82.2% vs. 71.1%), though this was not a statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: Despite implementation of multiple interventions, out-of-range factor dosing continues to occur. Our team plans to reinstate simulation center education for ED staff and continue education efforts of pharmacists and hematology trainees with the goal of further reducing out-of-range dosing in our ED.

Management of pregnant women who have bleeding disorders.

Bleeding disorders, including von Willebrand disease (VWD), hemophilia, other coagulation factor deficiencies, platelet disorders, defects of fibrinolysis, and connective tissue disorders, have both maternal and fetal implications. Successful management of bleeding disorders in pregnant women requires not only an understanding of bleeding disorders but also an understanding of when and how bleeding occurs in pregnancy. Bleeding does not occur during a normal pregnancy with a healthy placenta. Bleeding occurs during pregnancy when there is an interruption of the normal utero-placental interface, during miscarriage, during an ectopic pregnancy, or at the time of placental separation at the conclusion of pregnancy. Although mild platelet defects may be more prevalent, the most commonly diagnosed bleeding disorder among women is VWD. Other bleeding disorders are less common, but hemophilia carriers are unique in that they are at risk of bleeding themselves and of giving birth to an affected male infant. General guidance for maternal management of a woman who is moderately or severely affected includes obtaining coagulation factor levels at a minimum in the third trimester; planning for delivery at a center with hemostasis expertise; and anticipating the need for hemostatic agents. General guidance for fetal management includes pre-pregnancy counseling; the option of preimplantation genetic testing for hemophilia; delivery at a tertiary care center with pediatric hematology and newborn intensive care; consideration of cesarean delivery of a potentially severely affected infant; and avoidance of invasive procedures such as scalp electrodes and operative vaginal delivery in any potentially affected infant.

COMPARING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CONCENTRATE OF ALL PROTHROMBIN COMPLEX FACTORS WITH RECOMBINANT HUMAN COAGULATION FACTOR VIIa IN THE TREATMENT OF BLEEDING AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY.

OBJECTIVE: Aim: The authors evaluated the effectiveness of treatment with recombinant human coagulation factor VIIa and concentrate of all prothrombin complex factors in patients with massive postoperative bleeding that could not be controlled with traditional therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: In the period from 2020 to 2021, recombinant human coagulation factor VIIa was administered to 18 patients after cardiac surgery (group I), while the concentrate of all prothrombin complex factors was administered to 16 patients postoperatively (group II). During this period, 647 patients were operated on. The patients had normal coagulation screening tests (APTT, INR, TT, fibrinogen level, and PLT level) before surgery. Mean blood loss before and after administration of eptacog alfa and the total prothrombin complex concentrate was assessed. The mean dose of eptacog alfa was 30.95 mcg/kg b.w., and the total prothrombin complex factor concentrate dose was 14.17 mcg/kg b.w. After transfusion with red blood cell concentrate, fresh frozen plasma, and platelet concentrate, in the absence of improvement in the dynamics of postoperative drainage, it was decided to include recombinant human coagulation factor VIIa or a concentrate of all prothrombin complex factors in the treatment. RESULTS: Results: After administration of recombinant human coagulation factor VIIa at a dose of 30.95 mcg/kg b.w., bleeding stopped in 12 patients, but the remaining 6 patients required reoperation due to persistently high drainage. The decision to perform a rethoracotomy was made by a team of cardiothoracic surgeons and anesthesiologists, taking into account the dynamics of drainage (bleeding) and the hemodynamic stability of the patient. After the administration of concentrate of all prothrombin complex factors at a dose of 14.17 U/kg b.w., bleeding stopped in 12 patients. Four patients required reoperation due to persistent bleeding. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Treatment with recombinant human coagulation factor VIIa and concentrate of all prothrombin complex factors is effective and safe for cardiac surgery patients.

Adherence tool for prophylactic haemophilia treatment in adult and adolescent patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Hemophilia is a congenital bleeding disorder resulting from a low level or deficiency of clotting factors. It is an x-linked recessive disease and happens almost exclusively in males whereas females are the carrier of the affected gene. The most common types of hemophilia are hemophilia A and Hemophilia B. Hemophilia is classified into mild, moderate and severe. Prophylaxis treatment has more advantages clinically compare to on-demand therapy. It may reduce the bleeding frequency, gives protection from joint damage, may lower the number of total bleeding episodes per year, and may reduce annualised spontaneous and trauma related bleeding events. However, prophylaxis treatment needs regular weekly infusions therefore it is painful to administer especially if the vein is difficult to access. It may cause pain at the site of injections and may lead to non-adherence to treatment. Non-adherence to a regimen will result in insufficient clotting factor levels in the body. The efficacy of the medication is reduced and may lead to a high bleeding tendency. Thus far, the study on adult haemophilic patient adherence tool is scarce and limited; and therefore this review is warranted. The study protocol is conducted as per the PRISMA-P guideline. There are 4 concepts in this systematic review which are Haemophilia, adult and adolescence, preventive treatment and adherence. Articles will be sought from electronic databases PUBMED, Ovid EMBASE, CINAHL, and SCOPUS using the MeSH term, synonym free-text word, truncation, and proximity operators as per each database. The proposed keywords within each concept will be joined using the Boolean operator "OR "and the 4 different concepts combined using the Boolean operator "AND". Search will be limited to Human, English language, and publication until 2022. Studies will be included if they meet the study inclusion criteria. The quality of the studies will be appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS) for observation-based studies. This systematic review does not require formal ethical approval as data will be extracted from selected published studies. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and relevant conference presentations.(PROSPERO registration CRD42021273813).

Reversal of pre-injury factor-Xa inhibitors with prothrombin complex concentrates in patients following traumatic brain injury.

INTRODUCTION: There is substantial debate on the best method to reverse factor Xa-inhibitors in patients following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) have been used for this indication but their role has been questioned. This study reported failure rates with PCC in patients following TBI and as a secondary objective, compared 4-factor (4 F-PCC) and activated PCC (APCC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with TBI on factor Xa-inhibitors admitted to one of two trauma centers were retrospectively identified. Patients with penetrating TBI, delays in PCC administration (>6 h), receipt of tranexamic acid, factor VIIa or no follow up CT-scan were excluded. The primary outcome was treatment failure defined as hematoma expansion > 20% from baseline for SDH, EDH or IPH, a new hematoma not present on the initial CT scan or any expansion of a SAH or IVH. Hematoma expansion was further categorized as symptomatic or asymptomatic, designated by a change in the motor GCS score, neurologic exam or change ≥ 3 in NIH Stroke Scale. Multi-variate analysis was performed. RESULTS: There were 43 patients with a mean age of 77 ± 13 years with primarily mild TBI (95%) after a ground level fall (79%). The mean dose was 41 ± 12 units/kg. Sixty percent received 4 F-PCC and 40% APCC. The incidence of treatment failure was 28% (12/43). Of the 12 patients with hematoma expansion, only 3 were symptomatic (9.3%). Hematoma expansion with 4 F-PCC and APCC were similar (27% vs. 29%,p = .859). Only sex was associated with hematoma expansion on multivariate analysis [OR (95% CI) = 6.7 (1.1 - 40.9)]. CONCLUSION: PCC was an effective option for factor Xa inhibitor reversal following TBI. The relationship between radiographic expansion and clinical expansion was poor.